The legal team of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, has filed a motion for an injunction against ...
Hosted on MSN22d
Our proscription illegal, Buhari, Osinbajo never signed as law required – IPOB on court rulingIPOB described the judgement as illegal because former President Muhammadu Buhari and ex-Vice President Yemi Osinbajo didn’t sign the memo authorizing the proscription. Describing the judgment ...
The next object of such proscription -- that of affecting the public sentiment of the North -- can certainly meet with no success. There may be a few persons who, from interested motives ...
The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has vehemently condemned the recent Court of Appeal decision upholding its proscription, describing the ruling as a “rape of justice” and a blatant ...
The Indigenous People of Biafra has asked the Supreme Court to overturn the judgment of the Court of Appeal which upheld its proscription and designated it as a terrorist organisation. The Court ...
The leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, has announced that the group will be approaching the Supreme Court to appeal the recently delivered judgment affirming its proscription.
The Court of Appeal in Abuja has affirmed the January 18, 2018 order by Justice Abdu Kafarati of the Federal High Court, Abuja proscribing the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) and designating it ...
The recent affirmation by Nigeria rsquo;s Court of Appeal, designating the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) as a terrorist ...
The Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, has rejected the Appeal Court’s ruling that affirmed the late Justice Abdul Kafarati’s judgement that proscribed its activities. IPOB described the ...
The Court of Appeal in Abuja, on Thursday, affirmed the proscription of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) and its designation as a terrorist organisation. IPOB is a group leading agitation ...
The legal team of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, has filed a motion for an injunction against the Court of Appeal’s judgment affirming the group’s proscription.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results