A sports columnist for the most respected Telegraph newspaper in London has jumped into the Sam Kerr debate without ...

Two construction associations and a contractor are suing to block a Minnesota law that will provide stiff penalties for misclassifying employees as independent contractors.

The court found that Sako’s condition, silicosis, fell under the 1942 Act, which meant he was not entitled to claim under the uninsured liability scheme. As a result, the court ruled that his proposed ...

An ordinary court proceeding on a minor traffic matter before a Toowoomba court took a fiery turn when a personal trainer ...

Three Melbourne men have admitted their roles in the brutal bashing of a DJ just minutes after he left a club on New Year’s ...

In Australia, the Family Law Act 1975 is the cornerstone legislation that governs the division of property during divorce proceedings. This Act ensures that decisions are made based on fairness, ...

A few things should be kept in mind when acting as the lawyers on the court record so as to protect the costs entitlement that may arise from the "in-house solicitor rule" recognised in Bell Lawyers ...

The High Court ruled judges have immunity from civil suits, overturning a $309,000 award to a man who was wrongly imprisoned by Federal Circuit Court Judge Salvatore Vasta.

Federal Circuit Court Judge Salvatore Vasta had been held personally liable for wrongly jailing a man during a divorce case.

One of the judges whose court could hear a case challenging Trump’s agenda is Judge Jeffrey Sutton. He’s the chief judge of ...

The weapon of choice for sovereign citizens is paper. A simple traffic violation or pet-licensing case can end up provoking dozens of court filings containing hundreds of pages of pseudo-legal ...

Judges have pumped the breaks on Trump's efforts to freeze spending, curtail birthright citizenship, reduce the federal ...