Is it better to encode in AAC or AC3? : r/handbrake - Reddit
2023年3月20日 · In terms of quality I’d go with AAC (on my LG C1 AAC plays fine up to 5.1 channels, the TV will pass the sound to your sound system as PCM). If you want maximum compatibility for 5.1 channels AC3/Dolby Digital is probably the most widely supported surround sound codec, AAC is commonly used for stereo tracks and should work fine on most devices.
AC3 vs AAC for 5.1/surround sound in 2019? : r/audio - Reddit
2019年2月20日 · The difference in file size between that and re-encoding as AC3 is negligible at best, likely a few dozen MB, and in exchange you will have worsened it considerably. If you really insist, multi-channel AAC will certainly be future-compatible and will suffer the least generational loss. Otherwise: AC3 (Dolby Digital): Most compatible, worst sound
Looking for an opinion of Eac-3 vs AAC : r/handbrake - Reddit
2019年6月12日 · If you wish to encode from DTSMA to AC3 or AAC I'd suggest using eac3To freeware audio encoder. Ironically it doesn’t handle EAC3 (Dolby Digital Plus) but will create superb AC3 and AAC encodes from DTSMA, Atmos/TrueHD, Flac, WAV and numerous other audio formats. It encodes using the full lossless element of DTSMA and the difference is ...
Trying to clarify my understanding of AAC vs AC3 : r/PleX - Reddit
2016年6月20日 · Actually this is a fun fact....An AAC stereo track @ 160-256Kbps AND a AC3 5.1 track @ 640Kbps together, is still smaller than a single DTS audio track because DTS 5.1 has a bitrate of 1500Kbps. So if you're remuxing MKV files with a DTS track for instance, the resulting MP4/M4V file with AAC and AC3 audio will actually be smaller than the ...
AAC Vs AC3.. : r/handbrake - Reddit
2021年8月9日 · Higher bit rate encodes of Blu-rays almost always use the lossy core (AC3 or DTS) of the lossless stream. Or the full lossless track on much larger encodes or Blu-ray remuxes. AAC is used for a variety of reasons. AAC is universally compatible, an AAC 5.1 will work on an AAC stereo set up. Free AAC encoders are widely available.
not sure if I should use ac3 or aac : r/handbrake - Reddit
2020年4月20日 · It should reduce each PCM file by around 30% without any audio loss. All universal software players (VLC, KM etc) will play flac audio and the flac files could later be converted to AAC or AC3 if you needed. EAC3To is an excellent audio encoder to use for that. FYI AC3 640 sounds noticeably superior to AC3 384 (Especially if 5.1).
AC3 5.1 640 kbps vs E-AC3 5.1 640 kbps Which is better when
2021年11月12日 · If these are your only two choices, I'd say AC3. While the ffmpeg AC3 encoder is not as good as some commercial implementation, it is decent and very mature. 5.1 AC3 at 640kbps will most likely be transparent. The ffmpeg E-AC3 encoder, however, is experimental.
AC3 Better Than E-AC3? : r/PleX - Reddit
I hear AAC 5.1 is used for some things Europe. AC3 is standard on Bluray and UHD Bluray as a compatibility audio format. Curious what you are playing the files on that Plex has to transcode.
aac vs ac3 for better quality : r/techsupport - Reddit
2017年12月2日 · AAC is a newer format than AC3. AAC was intended to replace MP3, not AC3. mp4/h264/aac 2.0 really only got popular because lots of mobile devices and game consoles (Apple, PS3, Xbox) used the format. mkv is a better container format imo because it can use a wider variety of video, audio and subtitle formats than mp4 can.
Audio Codecs, AC3 vs AAC For Samsung TV : r/PleX - Reddit
2020年9月7日 · AC3 is Dolby Digital. It's designed for movies and TV. AAC is an audio codec designed mostly to replace MP3 for music. I prefer using AC3. It's also compatible with almost everything, unlike AAC and especially DTS. Having said that, AAC vs AC3 vs DTS should be pretty irrelevant as far as a modern Samsung TV and direct playing 4K content goes.