Is the NKJV based on the Textus Receptus or the Critical Text?
2008年8月29日 · What they wanted was a version that was based on what they considered the best manuscripts available, namely the Textus Receptus or the Majority Text which also underlies the AV. As Dr. Arthur L. Farstad, Executive Editor of the New King James Version wrote: "the NKJV is an update of an historic version translated from a specific type of text.
KJV 2016 Version Published - The Puritan Board
2016年1月13日 · Nick Sayers of Byron Bay, Australia, under the auspices of Textus Receptus PTY. LTD. has published the King James Version 2016 (KJV 2016) New Testament using the Textus Receptus Greek of the King James Version of 1611, endeavouring to keep the words as close to the KJV 1611 as possible, but with corresponding modern words and grammar.
New King James Or NIV? - The Puritan Board
2015年1月12日 · D.A. Carson said, in his "The King James Version Debate, A Plea For Realism," that it is the best English translation. I used it in conjunction with the AV for years, and still do. Unfortunately there have been two revisions If I recall correctly, and the 2011 revision is "gender neutral" which I find unacceptable.
21st Century King James Version (KJ21) | The Puritan Board
2006年9月7日 · The text of the 21st Century King James Version (KJ21), maybe quoted in any form (written, visual, electronic, or audio) up to and inclusive of two hundred (200) verses without prior written permission of the publisher, provided that the verses quoted do not account for more than 40 percent of the work in which they are quoted, and provided ...
NKJV?? - The Puritan Board
2012年2月18日 · Sad to say, but I think it has to do with marketing. The publishers of the NIV and ESV translations have done a much better job of convincing people that their version is the best (or in this case, one of the best). I found this article by Michael Marlowe compelling: New King James Version We use the NKJV for our family devotionals and read alouds.
KJV Update Project - The Puritan Board
2023年3月28日 · The New King James Version (NKJV) in fact is not a strict update of the KJV into contemporary English, for it contains new translation from the original languages and significantly differs in meaning from the KJV in many places (e.g. Genesis 49:6, 2 Kings 23:29, Job 17:6, Psalm 139:16, Isaiah 9:3, Matthew 6:13).
Why choose the NKJV over the ESV (or vice-versa ... - The Puritan …
2009年10月1日 · "In conclusion we will say that the New King James Version is comparable to the NASB in literal accuracy, and sometimes exceeds it. It is equally valuable for detailed study of the Bible. Its English style is superior to the NASB." (New King James Version) I personally use the NKJV as my primary version.
Is the KJV Bible copyrighted? | The Puritan Board
2018年6月22日 · Since you hope to publish in the UK, you will need the appropriate credit line. For the KJV, the one requested by the publisher reads: "Scripture quotations from the Authorized (King James) Version. Rights in the Authorized Version in …
Why do Reformers like the King James version rather ... - The …
2012年8月16日 · The annotations which are an important part of the Geneva Bible were Calvinist and Puritan in character, and as such they were disliked by the ruling pro-government Anglicans of the Church of England, as well as King James I, who commissioned the "Authorized Version", or King James Bible, in order to replace it. The Geneva Bible had also ...
New Living Translation - The Puritan Board
2009年7月30日 · The King James Version 13 And when they were departed, behold, the angel of the Lord appeareth to Joseph in a dream, saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and flee into Egypt, and be thou there until I bring thee …